Dear Readers,
Welcome back to The Global Brief, your trusted window into the shifting dynamics of global power and geopolitics. In todayās issue, we dissect former U.S. President Donald Trumpās bold claim that several nations ā including Pakistan ā are conducting nuclear tests, and his call for America to restart its own after more than three decades.
š¬ āEveryoneās Testing ā Except Usā: Trumpās Provocative Assertion
In a CBS 60 Minutes interview, Trump alleged that multiple nations ā Russia, China, North Korea, and Pakistan ā are actively testing nuclear weapons while the United States remains the only one abstaining.
āRussiaās testing, Chinaās testing ā but they donāt talk about it. Weāre an open society. We have to talk about it because otherwise, you people [the media] will report it,ā Trump said.
āWeāre going to test because they test ā and certainly, North Korea and Pakistan are testing.ā
Trumpās statement surprised many, especially his mention of Pakistan, a country that has not publicly tested a nuclear device since 1998, following Indiaās Pokhran-II series. Islamabad has made no official comment on Trumpās remarks, leaving analysts debating whether he was referring to covert subcritical tests or simply making a political point.
š°ļø A Break from 33 Years of Nuclear Silence
Since 1992, the United States has upheld a moratorium on explosive nuclear testing, relying instead on advanced computer simulations to maintain its stockpile. This has been a cornerstone of Americaās arms control leadership ā until now.

Trumpās recent comments appear to signal a radical departure from that policy.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One earlier, he declared:
āWe have more nuclear weapons than anybody. We donāt test ā but others are doing it. I think itās appropriate that we do also.ā
He hinted that preparations for renewed testing are already underway, though he declined to specify when or where such tests might occur.
š The Geopolitical Earthquake: A Return to the Testing Era
If the U.S. resumes nuclear testing, it would mark the first detonation since September 1992, when the Cold Warās end brought hopes of permanent restraint. Analysts warn that such a move could trigger a new global arms race, as rival powers respond in kind.
In parallel, Russia has escalated its posture by withdrawing from a plutonium disposal agreement with Washington. That 2000 pact had required both countries to safely dispose of 34 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium, enough for about 17,000 nuclear warheads.
By nullifying the deal, President Vladimir Putin effectively reopened the door to unrestricted nuclear buildup.

šµš° Pakistan in the Spotlight: Reality or Rhetoric?
Trumpās inclusion of Pakistan in his list of nuclear testers raised eyebrows across South Asia.
No credible evidence exists that Islamabad has resumed underground testing, but satellite images from the past few years have shown activity near historical test sites in Balochistanās Chagai region.
Experts suggest this could involve non-explosive diagnostics or maintenance work, not actual detonations. Still, the geopolitical implications are serious.
According to Dr. Ankit Panda of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:
āThereās no verified indication that Pakistan has resumed testing. But such statements ā especially from a former U.S. president ā can influence regional stability and diplomatic trust.ā
Pakistan and India maintain a mutual deterrence equilibrium, both possessing approximately 170ā180 nuclear warheads each. Any suggestion of renewed testing could rekindle tensions in an already fragile strategic environment.
š The New Arms Race: Power, Prestige, and Deterrence
During the same interview, Trump claimed the U.S. holds more nuclear weapons than any other nation, adding:
āWe have enough to blow up the world 150 times. Russia has a lot, and China will soon have quite a bit.ā

While his figure is rhetorical, current estimates by the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) list:
U.S.: ~5,044 total warheads
Russia: ~5,580
China: ~500+ and rapidly expanding
Analysts fear that once Washington resumes testing, both Moscow and Beijing will accelerate their own modernization programs ā including Russiaās Poseidon underwater drone and Chinaās hypersonic glide vehicles.
For North Korea, which already conducts frequent underground tests, a renewed American program could be used to justify further escalations.
š Arms Control Under Strain
Trumpās stance comes amid the steady erosion of arms control treaties.
The INF Treaty ā which eliminated an entire class of mid-range missiles ā was terminated in 2019. Meanwhile, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), though signed by 187 nations, has never entered into force due to non-ratification by key states including the U.S. and China.
Resuming tests now would effectively nullify the CTBTās credibility and encourage other nuclear states to follow suit.
āThe taboo against testing is one of the strongest barriers we have left,ā warns Rose Gottemoeller, former NATO Deputy Secretary General. āIf the U.S. breaks it, others will too ā and weāll be back to the arms race we thought we buried.ā
š§ Strategic Logic or Political Posturing?
Supporters of Trumpās view argue that the U.S. cannot rely indefinitely on computer modeling to ensure the reliability of its aging nuclear arsenal.
They claim controlled testing could confirm the safety and performance of warheads as they undergo modernization.
A senior Pentagon official, quoted anonymously by The Wall Street Journal, said:
āOur adversaries are modernizing in secret. Weāre modernizing with one hand tied behind our back.ā
Reports indicate renewed technical readiness at the Nevada National Security Site, historically used for underground tests. However, there is no official announcement or timeline for any new detonations.
š The Global Fallout
Reactions to Trumpās comments have been mixed across the international landscape.
European allies voiced deep concern over the potential collapse of nuclear stability frameworks.
China criticized Washington for āundermining global security architecture.ā
Russia largely welcomed the shift, viewing it as validation of its own recent test activities.
U.S. defense hardliners, meanwhile, hailed Trumpās stance as ārealismā and a restoration of deterrence.
Environmental groups have also warned of radiation hazards, environmental degradation, and public health impacts that could result from renewed nuclear explosions.
If nuclear testing resumes globally, it could erode decades of progress, potentially inviting a cascade of underground and atmospheric detonations worldwide.

ā ļø A Turning Point in Nuclear History
Whether Trumpās statements translate into action or remain rhetoric, they have already reshaped the global conversation on nuclear deterrence.
For the first time since the 1990s, the world is openly debating not how to disarm ā but who will test next.
As the U.S., Russia, and China continue to redefine the balance of nuclear power, the fragile peace that has endured for three decades faces an unprecedented test of endurance and diplomacy.
š Thank You for Reading
Thank you for being part of The Global Brief community ā where we bring clarity, depth, and integrity to the worldās most complex geopolitical developments.
Stay tuned for our next issue, where we explore how emerging AI-driven defense technologies are changing the future of warfare and deterrence.
Warm regards,
ā The Global Brief Editorial Team
āAI OBSERVER
āļø Disclaimer
This newsletter is a journalistic and analytical rewrite of publicly available information. It does not confirm or endorse any political statement.
All attributed quotes are paraphrased or cited from credible public sources.
This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as policy advice.

